Legal Opinion
Burlington Drug Co., Inc. v. Royal Globe Ins. Co.
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided August 15, 1985No. Civ. A. 85-54PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BILLINGS, District Judge.
This suit was filed as a declaratory judgment action, wherein Plaintiff Burlington Drug Company, Inc. (hereinafter BDC) requested a ruling that Defendant Royal Globe Insurance Company, one of the Plaintiff’s insurers, is obligated to defend BDC in a separate action filed by the United States naming BDC as a defendant. 1 On June 4, 1985, this Court ruled that, pursuant to the terms of its insurance policy with Plaintiff, Defendant Royal Globe has a duty to defend BDC in the underlying suit. BDC now seeks an award of attorney’s fees incurred in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Conway v. Country Casualty Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Albright v. FishSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- Loeb v. LoebSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
- Crist v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1982
- State v. Glens Falls Insurance Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- SL Industries, Inc. v. American Motorists InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Monahan v. GMAC Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Village of Morrisville Water & Light Department v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, D. Vermont · 1991
- The Budd Company v. The Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Voorhees v. Preferred Mut. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.