Legal Opinion

Giroux v. New York Life Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 2, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

In her application for reinstatement the insured represented that, to the best of her knowledge and belief, she was in the same condition of health she had been in when the policy was issued, and that she had not “within the past two years” had “any illnesses, diseases or bodily injuries ” or “ consulted or been treated by any physician or physicians.” She certified that these representations were full, complete and true, and agreed that the defendant, believing them to be true, should rely and act thereon.

The plaintiff’s evidence tended to prove that the insured had ceased to work as a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frazier v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Whitten Oil, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  2. Peppin v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  3. BALAMOTIS v. HylandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  4. Dade v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API