Stephanie Lynn Bekendam v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BILL MEIER, Justice.
I. Introduction
Appellant Stephanie Lynn Bekendam appeals her conviction for driving while intoxicated, felony repetition.1 In one issue, Bekendam contends that the trial court erred by allowing the State’s expert to testify to trace levels of cocaine that the expert found when analyzing a sample of Bekendam’s blood. We will affirm.
II. Background
The underlying facts of this case are largely undisputed. The record demonstrates that on February 28, 2008, a witness saw Bekendam driving erratically, colliding her SUV into parked vehicles, and jumping curbs. Bekendam…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Casey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Hartman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bekendam, Stephanie LynnCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- David Rowe Ashby v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
- Stephanie Lynn Bekendam v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014