Legal Opinion

Basf Corp. v. Cesare's Collision Repair

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 24, 2019No. 1:18-cv-00519-DAD-BAMPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dale A. Drozd, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter came before the court on July 17, 2018 for a hearing on defendant Cesare's Collision Repair & Towing, Inc.'s ("Cesare's") motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 9.) Attorneys Bobbie R. Bailey and Emily Kate Doty appeared on behalf of plaintiff BASF Corporation ("BASF"). Attorney Dean A. Rocco appeared on behalf of defendant. The court has considered the parties' briefs and oral arguments, and for the reasons set forth below, will grant in part and deny in part defendant's motion to dismiss.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff BASF sells automotive refinish…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Corbrus, LLC v. 8th Bridge Capital, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2020
  2. Gonzalez v. Hoovestol Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2024
  3. Lee v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2024
  4. Lexington Insurance Company v. QBE Specialty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  5. Poer v. FTI Consulting, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API