Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Bankers Surety Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided April 15, 1908PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to direct a verdict for the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtSchmuck, J.

Plaintiff endeavors to recover the sum of $1,800 deposited with the defendant by plaintiff’s assignor to secure the defendant against any untoward act of plaintiff’s assignor. Defendant resists, protesting that as plaintiff’s assignor had violated his bond (in another matter) and thereby brought upon the defendant the liability for the penalty it had a right to offset that liability against plaintiff’s claim.

There can be no doubt that when plaintiff’s assignor violated the Excise Law he brought upon the defendant, his surety, a liability for the penalty of the bond, which liability the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chace v. HinmanNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  2. Smith v. . FeltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Gilbert v. . WimanNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
  4. Rockfeller v. DonnellyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1826
  5. Kolb v. . National Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schreiber v. Noe, New York County Courts1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API