Legal Opinion
Integrated Solutions, Inc. v. Service Support Specialties, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 11, 1996No. Civ. A. 94-4953(JCL)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LIFLAND, District Judge.
Service Support Specialties, Inc., Gary Hillman, Paul Sherman, Joseph O’Neill and Aaron Cruise (hereinafter “the SSSI defendants”) move for partial summary judgment dismissing Counts One through Seven of Integrated Solutions, Inc’s (“ISI”) Amended Complaint. 1 Resolution of the motion hinges on whether ISI has standing as the assignee of the causes of action of the now bankrupt company, Machine Technology, Inc. (“MTI”).
The Court holds that plaintiff does have standing to pursue Count One of the Amended Complaint, the copyright claim, which was freely assignable…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Integrated Solutions, Inc. v. Service Support Specialties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Delp v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Savage & Associates, P.C. Ex Rel. Teligent, Inc. v. Mandl (In Re Teligent, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Baum v. Duckor, Spradling & MetzgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- United Technologies Corp. v. GainesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.