Legal Opinion

Wittkowsky v. . Baruch

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 29, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Civil ActioN upon a money demand, to vacate a conveyance to feme defendant on ground of fraud, and for the appointment of a receiver, heard before Coble, J., at June Term, 1899, of MidcKLBNbueg Superior Court, upon demurrer. Demurrer sustained, and plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtFurches, J.

The plaintiff alleges that the defendant H. Baruch was indebted to him in the sum of $20,000, and on the first day of October, 1894, the said II. Baruch executed four notes to the plaintiff therefor, in the sum of $5,000 each; that the said IT. Baruch became financially embarrassed, and on the first day of July, 1895, made a general assignment to the plaintiff as trustee for the benefit of his creditors, the plaintiff being one of them; that by an agreement between the defendant IT. Baruch, E. D. Latta and the plaintiff, on the 21st day of September’, 1895, the plaintiff assigned to said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Redmond v. . ChandleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Farthing v. CarringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wittkowsky v. Baruch.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API