Legal Opinion
Udoinyion v. re/max of Atlanta.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 12, 2008No. A08A0482PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.
Sunday N. Udoinyion sued Re/Max of Atlanta (a real estate brokerage business) and two real estate agents affiliated with Re/Max, Bill Reed and Katie Milling, seeking damages for: (1) trespass on his property in violation of OCGA § 51-9-1; (2) invasion of privacy; (3) wilful misrepresentation of material fact in violation of OCGA § 51-6-2; and (4) intentional infliction of emotional distress. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants on all of these claims, and Udoinyion appeals. For the following reasons, we affirm.
The record shows that,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Yarbray v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Cabaniss v. HipsleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Peoples v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. MosleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ellison v. Burger King Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Benedict v. State Farm Bank, FSBCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Onbrand Media v. Codex Consulting, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Sitton v. Print Direction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- HUMPHREY v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.