Legal Opinion

Thornburg v. Gutridge

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

■From Grant: Morton D. Clifford, Judge. Proceedings supplementary to execution by Grant Thornburg against G. H. Gutridge. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Per curiam

1. This appeal is from certain findings of fact and a conclusion of law rendered in a proceeding supplementary to execution, upon which no final order or judgment was ever given or entered. For a sufficient statement of the facts, see State ex rel. v. Gutridge, 46 Or. 215 (80 Pac. 98), where they are set out and their effect determined. The appeal is prosecuted by the defendant, but it cannot be maintained, because not from a final order affecting a substantial right: B. & C. Comp. § 547. The circuit court did not proceed far enough. It has made its findings, but has omitted the essential…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. GutridgeOregon Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Botsford v. LanganNevada Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. Linn-Benton Distributing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Timoney v. McIntireOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Maslov v. Croatian Fraternal UnionOregon Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API