Legal Opinion

People v. Bludson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 2001PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

Criminal Procedure Law § 270.20 (1) (b) provides that a party-may challenge a prospective juror for cause if the juror “has a state of mind that is likely to preclude him [or her] from rendering an impartial verdict based upon the evidence at the trial.” Upon such a challenge “a juror who has revealed doubt, because of prior knowledge or opinion, about [his or] her ability to serve impartially must be excused unless the juror states unequivocally on the record that [he or] she can be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. ArnoldNew York Court of Appeals · 2001

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. People v. ChambersNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. People v. CahillNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. State v. CampanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Hayes v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  5. People v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API