Loe v. State

OPINION

BARTEAU, Judge.

Seott Loe appeals his conviction following a jury trial of Driving While an Habitual Traffic Offender, a class D felony1. We reverse because the evidence is insufficient.

DISCUSSION

Loe argues that the evidence is not sufficient to support his conviction because the State did not prove that the BMV sent notice of his suspended license to his last known address nor did the State prove that the notice allegedly sent was in compliance with due process requirements. Because we reverse, we address only the issue whether the State was required to prove the contents of the notice.