Legal Opinion
Naster v. Naster
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided April 8, 1964No. 32666PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
163 So.2d 264 (1964)
Bert NASTER, Petitioner,
v.
Lee NASTER, Respondent.
No. 32666.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 8, 1964.
Rehearing Denied May 13, 1964.
Joseph Pardo, Miami, for petitioner.
Ralph R. Quillian, Hollywood, for respondent.
THORNAL, Justice.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, allegedly in conflict with prior decisions of this Court.
The alleged point of cleavage involves a consideration of the extent of a husband's burden when defending against an alimony contempt citation on the ground of financial inability…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kahn v. KahnSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Jacobs v. JacobsSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Orr Ex Rel. Walton v. OrrSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
- Phelan v. PhelanSupreme Court of Florida · 1868
- English v. EnglishDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Faircloth v. FairclothSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Rose v. Palm Beach Cty.Supreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Kalmutz v. KalmutzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Chappell v. ChappellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Faircloth v. FairclothDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.