Legal Opinion

Chapple v. Kansas Vitrified Brick Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 11, 1905No. 13,911PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Neosho district court; Lbander Still-well, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Greene, J. :

This was an action for the recovery of real property. The defendant admitted the plaintiffs5" title but pleaded possession and right of possession; under an oil and gas lease. Judgment was rendered! for defendant, from which plaintiffs prosecute error.. While there are many alleged errors of which complaint is made, those which concern the instructions are the most important. The following portions of *724the lease become necessary to a clear presentation and determination of the question presented :

“This lease, made between F. H. Chappie and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gadbury v. Ohio & Indiana Consolidated Natural & Illuminating Gas Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Simpson v. BoringSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  3. Edwards v. Iola Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. PrachtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kolachny v. GalbreathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Eastern Oil Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Shaffer v. MarksDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Menardi v. WackerNevada Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Ireland v. ChatmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API