Wilson v. Fridenberg
Supreme Court of Florida
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison county, to which the case had been transferred from the Circuit Court for Duval county. . The facts of the case are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chief-Justice
delivered the opinion of the court:
The facts in this case are fully set forth in Wilson vs. Fridenberg, 19 Fla., 461, and in Fridenberg vs. Wilson, 20 Fla., 359. The ease now comes before this court on an amended bill, to which Edgar C. Parkhurst and Daisy E. Parkhurst, heirs at law of Converse Parkhurst, deceased, are added as parties to the bill, and seeks to foreclose the *388mortgage set forth in 19 Fla., 461, on Lots Ros. 2 and 5 in Block Ro. 25, in the city of Jacksonville. The bill prays-that in case it should be adjudged by this court that the said mortgage be not a valid…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Supervisors v. KennicottSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Tyler v. MagwireSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Wilson v. FridenburgSupreme Court of Florida · 1882
- Brokaw v. McDougallSupreme Court of Florida · 1883
- Fridenburg v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1883
3Cited by23 opinions
- Strazzulla v. HendrickSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
- McKinnon v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
- State ex rel. Reynolds v. WhiteSupreme Court of Florida · 1898
- Jordan v. SayreSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
- Miller v. FineganSupreme Court of Florida · 1890
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.