In the Interest of C. B.

Ruffin, Presiding Judge.

The biological father of C. B. appeals the juvenile court’s order terminating his parental rights. He asserts that the evidence was insufficient to support the termination, that the court failed to enter specific findings of fact supporting the termination, and that the court erroneously denied him his right to counsel.1 Finding the evidence sufficient and no reversible error, we affirm.

1. The standard of review for orders terminating parental rights requires that “we view the evidence in a light most favorable to the juvenile court’s ruling and determine whether a…