Legal Opinion

Menne v. Celotex Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 26, 1989No. 86-2350PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

861 F.2d 1453

57 USLW 2404, Prod.Liab.Rep.(CCH)P 11,973

Mary K. MENNE, Personal Representative of the Estate of

Donald R. Menne, deceased, Plaintiff/Appellee,

v.

The CELOTEX CORPORATION, Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., and

Fibreboard Corporation, Defendants/Appellants,

Keene Corporation, Owens-Corning Fibreglas Corporation,

Owens-Illinois, Inc., Pittsburg Corning

Corporation, and Raymark Industries,

Inc., Defendants.

No. 86-2350.

United States Court of Appeals,

Tenth Circuit.

Nov. 28, 1988.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 26, 1989.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 26, 1989.

Paul H. Hulsey, Blatt, & Fales, P.A., Charleston, S.C.…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation Mdl No. 381Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  5. Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Menne v. Celotex Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1989
  2. Sheffield v. Owens-Corning FiberglassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Pfeiffer v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API