State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Edgard Francisco Talave Latino, Appellant
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1. For purposes of the domestic-assault statute, a “family or household member” may include persons involved in not only a current, but also a former significant romantic or sexual relationship. 2. The evidence presented at trial was sufficient to support the district court’s finding that the appellant had been involved in a significant romantic or sexual relationship with the victim as required by the statute. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the Court
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A23-0590 Court of Appeals McKeig, J. Took no part, Hennesy, J. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Filed: January 8, 2025 Office of Appellate Courts Edgard Francisco Talave Latino, Appellant. ________________________ Keith Ellison, Attorney General, Peter Magnuson, Assistant Attorney General, Saint Paul, Minnesota; and Brandi Schiefelbein, Meeker County Attorney, Litchfield, Minnesota, for respondent. Cathryn Middlebrook, Chief Appellate Public Defender, Sharon E. Jacks, Assistant Public Defender, Saint Paul, Minnesota, for appellant.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bernhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. ThonesavanhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Staab v. Diocese of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. DickersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.