Legal Opinion
HUTHNANCE v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 19, 2011No. Civil Action 06-1871 RCLPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
On March 25, 2011 the jury returned a verdict in favor of Lindsay Huthnance, the plaintiff in this case. Specifically, the jury found that Metropolitan Police Department Officers Liliana Acebal and James Antonio falsely arrested Huthnance; that Acebal committed the tort of assault and battery against Huthnance; that Acebal and Antonio violated Huthnance’s First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendment rights under the United States Constitution; that the District of Columbia violated Huthnanee’s Fifth Amendment rights; that the District of Columbia was…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Sherrod v. McHughCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Hunter v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Hancock v. Washington Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Finch v. Covil Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2019
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.