Legal Opinion
Priests for Life v. United States Department of Health & Human Services
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 20, 2015No. 13-5368, 13-5371, 14-5021PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
On Petition for Rehearing En Banc
2Per curiam
Appellants/eross-appellees’ joint petition for rehearing en banc and the response thereto were circulated to the full court, and a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges eligible to participate did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the petition be denied.
A statement by Circuit Judge PILLARD, joined by Circuit Judges ROGERS and WILKINS, concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc, is attached.
A statement by Circuit Judge BROWN, joined by Circuit Judge HENDERSON, dissenting from the…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Priests for Life v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- University of Notre Dame v. Sylvia Mathews BurwellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
4Cited by83 opinions
- Caitlin Ahearn v. Hyundai Motor AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Atlanta v. Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- New Doe Child 1 v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Real Alternatives, Inc. v. BurwellDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- (SS) (CONSENT) Frits v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.