The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Atlanta v. Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judge:
The” plaintiffs in these consolidated appeals challenge the regulations implementing-what is known as the “contraceptive mandate” of the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) — the requirement that employers provide health insurance coverage for preventive care (including contraception) to women.1 Specifically, the plaintiffs argue that the regulations’ accommodation for nonprofit organizations with a religious objection to providing contraceptive coverage violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb, el seq. They claim that the accommodation…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. R.G. &. G.R. Harris Funeral Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Commonwealth of MA v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- State of California v. the Little Sisters of the PoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Ferox, LLC v. Conseal International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.