Triangle Mint Corp. v. Mulrooney
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
An equity court should exercise its jurisdiction to restrain the police from enforcing a criminal statute, the enforcement of which threatens property damage, only in cases where a clear legal right to that relief is established. The record in this case does not establish such a clear legal right. For that reason the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by14 opinions
- Reed v. LittletonNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Baris Shoe Co. v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Snap 'N' Pops, Inc. v. DillonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Kelley v. KavanaughDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1933
- Eisenberg v. KennedyNew York Supreme Court · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.