Legal Opinion
Baris Shoe Co. v. Town of Oyster Bay
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 2, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff was entitled to continue its present use of part of the premises at 280 Duffy Avenue in Hicksville as a retail shoe store, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Collins, J.), dated February 24, 1994, which denied the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, and (2) stated portions of an order and judgment (one paper) of the same court dated January 5, 1995, which, inter alia, denied the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and declared that the use…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Parkview Associates v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. GoodmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Davis v. American Society for Prevention of Cruelty to AnimalsNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Delaney v. . FloodNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Town of Putnam Valley v. SacramoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Indelicato v. Town of LloydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Town of Southold v. Estate of EdsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Carro's Limousine Service, Inc. v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998