Legal Opinion
City of Huntington Park v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 12, 1995No. B087234PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
Petitioner City of Huntington Park (the City) seeks a writ of mandate which directs the respondent court to vacate its order on demurrer, which allows plaintiff Gadi Flores (Flores) to proceed with an action under 42 United States Code Annotated section 1983 (hereafter section 1983). Flores’s action was filed within one year of the time Flores obtained his majority, but more than a year after the events complained of, which occurred in 1991. The City seeks to bar all claims, based on the statute of limitations. Flores contends the statute was tolled during his minority under…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hardin v. StraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rosenberg v. FleutiSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- May v. EnomotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Weeks v. Baker & McKenzieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Regents of University v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Souza v. Westlands Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Lacey v. C.S.P. Solano Medical StaffDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1997
- Construction Financial v. Perlite Plastering Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.