Legal Opinion

Ladouceur v. Northern Pacific Railroad

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1892No. o. 287PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J. —

The appellant sued the respondent for damages for injuries caused by the negligence of the railroad company. At the close of plaintiff’s testimony, the court granted a motion for a non-suit on the ground that his evidence showed thathe was negligent, and that his negligence contributed to the injury. The plaintiff was a youth twenty-one years of age, and at the time he was injured was driving a team and wagon on a street in the city of Seattle, and was injured by a collision at the public crossing with the train of defendant on the afternoon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schofield v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Northern Pacific Railroad v. Holmes, Washington Territory1888
  3. Northern Pacific Railroad v. Holmes, Washington Territory1887

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McQuillan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Hillebrant v. ManzWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Woole v. Washington Railway & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Coleman v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Canterbury v. Director General of RailroadsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API