Legal Opinion

State v. Mullin-Coston

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 2004No. 73765-7PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridge, J.

Thomas Mullin-Coston was convicted of premeditated first degree murder for his participation in the killing of 15-year-old Sarah Starling. In an earlier trial, Mullin-Coston’s friend, Jason McDaniels, was convicted of second degree murder for his own role in Starling’s death. Mullin-Coston argues that his jury inappropriately relied on McDaniels’ premeditation to convict Mullin-Coston based on the law of complicity, even though McDaniels’jury concluded that McDaniels had not acted with premeditation. Mullin-Coston argues that as a result, the doctrine of nonmutual collateral estoppel requires…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Porcell v. Lincoln Wood Products, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. StephensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. State v. Mullin-CostonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. Superior Court (Sparks)California Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Christensen v. Grant County Hosp. Dist.Washington Supreme Court · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API