Legal Opinion

State v. Carter

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 29, 2021No. 74/19PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

State of Maryland v. Kennard Carter, No. 74, September Term, 2019. Opinion by Biran, J. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – FOURTH AMENDMENT – SEIZURE – The Court of Appeals held that a Maryland Transit Authority (“MTA”) police officer seized Respondent within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment when the officer announced a fare sweep aboard a Baltimore Light Rail train after it arrived at a station. A reasonable passenger would not have felt free to leave the train without first displaying proof of fare payment, or the lack thereof, to the officer. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – FOURTH AMENDMENT – IMPLIED CONSENT –…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  2. Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  3. Harley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
  4. Prince v. WiedefeldDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
  5. Shuler v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API