State v. Carter
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
State of Maryland v. Kennard Carter, No. 74, September Term, 2019. Opinion by Biran, J. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – FOURTH AMENDMENT – SEIZURE – The Court of Appeals held that a Maryland Transit Authority (“MTA”) police officer seized Respondent within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment when the officer announced a fare sweep aboard a Baltimore Light Rail train after it arrived at a station. A reasonable passenger would not have felt free to leave the train without first displaying proof of fare payment, or the lack thereof, to the officer. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – FOURTH AMENDMENT – IMPLIED CONSENT –…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Harley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
- Prince v. WiedefeldDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
- Shuler v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.