Legal Opinion
United States v. Keith L. Winegar, Individually and Doing Business as Intermountain Oil Distributors
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 19, 1958No. 5749_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Chief Judge.
Invoking pertinent provisions of the so-called Walsh-Healey Act, 49 Stat. 2036, as amended, 41 U.S.C.A. § 35 et. seq., the United States instituted this-action against Keith L. Winegar, individually and doing business as Intermoun-tain Oil Distributors, to recover liquidated damages for failure and refusal to pay overtime rates of compensation for overtime work. It was pleaded in the complaint that the Government awarded to-the defendant five contracts for the furnishing of fuel oil; that the contracts, were subject to the terms of the Act; that the defendant failed and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Unexcelled Chemical Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. Lovknit Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Lance, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- United States v. W. H. Kistler Stationery Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
3Cited by9 opinions
- States Marine Corporation of Delaware, Libelant-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Johnson v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- United States v. Cincinnati Transit, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1972
- Aguilar v. ClaytonDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1978
- Hahn v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.