Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Weigel

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2012No. 2010AP1523-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. Attorney Joseph W Weigel appeals Referee Christine Harris Taylor's report and recommendation that his license to practice law in Wisconsin be suspended, and that he should pay the costs of the disciplinary proceeding. Attorney Weigel argues that the referee erroneously concluded he committed the misconduct alleged in the OLR's complaint.

¶ 2. On review, we accept the referee's factual findings and her conclusions with respect to the first two counts alleged in the disciplinary complaint. We dismiss the third count and we have concluded that a public reprimand is sufficient discipline for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Bergantzel v. MlynarikSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  4. Matter of StruthersArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  5. The Florida Bar v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Florida · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. WeigelWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In the Matter of ZakMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Burton (In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Diann P. Burton)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John Kenyatta RileyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John Kenyatta RileyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API