Legal Opinion

Rule v. Tait

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Original Proceedings in Quo Warranto. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This is an action in the nature of quo warranto, brought originally in this court on November 16, 1887, by J. E. Rule, under article 29 of the civil code, against J. H. Tait, to oust him from the office of treasurer of Sherman county, and for damages. Rule claims that he, instead of Tate, was and is entitled to the office. On November 1, 1887, Tait surrendered the office to Rule, and Rule is now holding the same; hence the only questions now to be determined are: What amount of damages shall be recovered, if any? and, Who shall pay the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ness v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Rasmussen v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Drach v. LeckenbySupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  4. Jansky v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  5. Lawrence v. WheelerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API