Bean v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Panel: Wright, Leahy, Irma S. Raker (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned), JJ.
Leahy, J.
*28 *345 Appellant, Anthony Bean, moved to suppress the pre-trial identification in this case because, he argued, it resulted from an impermissibly suggestive procedure and was unreliable in violation of his right to due process of law guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court has declared that the "primary evil" that impermissibly suggestive identifications procedures generate is the "very substantial likelihood of misidentification." Neil v. Biggers , 409 U.S. 188 ,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Perry v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- State of Tennessee v. Rhakim MartinTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Greene v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Bean v. State Of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Leo v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
- Reyes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2023