Legal Opinion
Greene v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 9, 2020No. 7/19PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Daniel Joseph Greene v. State of Maryland, No. 7, September Term, 2019 CRIMINAL LAW — CONSTITUTIONAL IDENTIFICATION LAW— NON-EYE- WITNESS IDENTIFICATION — CONFIRMATORY IDENTIFICATION The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals. That court held that the identification by a non-eyewitness who knew the suspect is not governed by constitutional identification law, but rather was a “confirmatory identification.” Conse- quently, the circuit court erred as a matter of law in applying the due process analysis of Neil v. Biggers,
409 U.S. 188
(1972), and Manson v.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- MAHDAVI v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2020
- State v. RhinesOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
- Lambert v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2026
- Leo v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
- Rainey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.