Legal Opinion

Rose v. Oneida Coal Co., Inc.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1995No. 22606PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice:

The plaintiffs below and appellants herein, Walter J. Rose and Ruth O. Rose, own the surface of some land located in Braxton County and assert that the Circuit Court of Braxton County erred in granting a summary judgment against them in their civil action for damages against Oneida Coal Company, Inc. (Oneida), the defendant below and appellee herein. Mr. and Mrs. Rose claim Oneida, through its underground coal mining, destroyed their water supply as well as caused subsidence to the surface of their property. This appeal is a sequel to Rose v. Oneida Coal Company, Inc., 180…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Painter v. PeavyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Federal Insurance Co. of New YorkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Chrystal R.M. v. Charlie A.L.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Smith v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Andrick v. Town of BuckhannonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Antco, Inc. v. Dodge Fuel Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Schultz v. Consolidation Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State Ex Rel. McGraw v. Imperial MarketingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. DK Excavating, Inc. v. MianoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State Ex Rel. McGraw v. West Virginia Ethics CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API