Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Consolidation Coal Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1996No. 23174PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORKMAN, Justice:

Charles and Claudia Schultz appeal the May 22,1995, final order of the Circuit Court of Marshall County, granting summary judgment to the Appellees, Consolidated Coal Co. (“Consol”) and Bert Shelek, in connection with the Appellants’ attempt to set aside a subsidence agreement they entered into with Consol. Based on our review of the record, the parties’ briefs and arguments, and all other matters submitted before this Court, we find that the lower court committed no error in granting summary judgment and, accordingly, we affirm.

I

The Appellants own the surface estate to a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Painter v. PeavyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Lengyel v. LintWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Horton v. TyreeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. National Wildlife Federation v. Manuel Lujan, Jr., National Coal Association and American Mining Congress, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  5. Canestraro v. FaerberWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Antco, Inc. v. Dodge Fuel Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Costilow v. Elkay Mining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. DK Excavating, Inc. v. MianoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Texas Eastern Transmission v. W. Va. Dept. of Environmental Protection, etc. and Marshall Co. Coal v. Texas Eastern TransmissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Louden v. West Virginia Division of Environmental ProtectionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API