Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Scholze

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 13, 1984No. 21889; CA A27923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Husband appeals an order that denied his motion to modify a decree to eliminate spousal support of $200 per month. He also seeks review of an intermediate order that required him to pay wife the sum of $455 for her travel and lodging expenses.

Husband, age 49, and wife, age 42, were married in 1959. A separation decree in 1974 required husband to pay $200 per month spousal support and $400 per month child support. In June, 1977, husband moved to modify the decree to eliminate spousal support. The court denied his motion, and we affirmed. Scholze and Scholze, 32 Or App 95, 573 P2d 330 (1978).…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hellweg v. HellwegCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. In re the Marriage of HardenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Matter of Marriage of MoakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. In re the Separation of ScholzeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. In re the Marriage of PraegitzerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Marriage of WilleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API