Birkhofer v. Krumm
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
This is a motion by appellant for diminution of the record for the purpose of supplying an alleged omission in the reporter’s transcript which occurs in the answer of a witness to the following question: “What was the value of the property described in the deed of trust, a copy of which is attached to the complaint in the pending action, on the 7th of October, 1935?” The reporter’s transcript shows that the answer to the interrogation was “About $1500.00.” This proceeding seeks to correct the answer so that it will read “About $1500.00 an acre.”
The motion is supported by an affidavit of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Webster v. WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- McMahon v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Dugan v. ForsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Keck v. KeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Barnett v. MarsiliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938