Legal Opinion

Novak v. Apollo Printing and Thermography, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1990No. 71A03-9005-CV-187PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant David S. Novak (No-vak) appeals a bench trial judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Apollo Printing and Thermography, Inc. (Apollo).

The facts of the case are as follows: On July 21, 1986, Apollo hired Novak as a production supervisor for its commercial printing business in South Bend, Indiana. Novak, a salaried employee, received $420.00 per week ($10.50 per hour) while the other employees received $4.50 to $6.00 per hour plus overtime. Although Novak often operated the 9850 A.B. Dick press with the other employees, he discussed work priorities…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Burger King CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  2. Fardy v. Physicians Health Rehabilitation Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Ingoglia v. Fogelson Companies, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Georgie Boy Mfg., Inc. v. ParisoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Prime Mortgage USA, Inc. v. NicholsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Shell Oil Co. v. MeyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Brant v. HesterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Todd v. StewartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Almacs Inc. v. DroginDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API