Novak v. Apollo Printing and Thermography, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant David S. Novak (No-vak) appeals a bench trial judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Apollo Printing and Thermography, Inc. (Apollo).
The facts of the case are as follows: On July 21, 1986, Apollo hired Novak as a production supervisor for its commercial printing business in South Bend, Indiana. Novak, a salaried employee, received $420.00 per week ($10.50 per hour) while the other employees received $4.50 to $6.00 per hour plus overtime. Although Novak often operated the 9850 A.B. Dick press with the other employees, he discussed work priorities…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Burger King CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Fardy v. Physicians Health Rehabilitation Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Ingoglia v. Fogelson Companies, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Georgie Boy Mfg., Inc. v. ParisoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
3Cited by6 opinions
- Prime Mortgage USA, Inc. v. NicholsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Shell Oil Co. v. MeyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Brant v. HesterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Todd v. StewartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Almacs Inc. v. DroginDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.