Tevis v. Savage
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County granting a new trial as to the corporation appellant and denying it as to the defendant respondent. A. S. Kittredge, Judge. ’ The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
This action was brought to recover of defendants the sum of seventeen hundred and sixty-two dollars, balance due for sale of fruit by plaintiff to one Herbert during the year 1896. The complaint alleges that defendants willfully and fraudulently represented to plaintiff that they were backing Herbert in buying fruit, and that any contract that he might make with Herbert would be performed on his part. That the defendants promised to pay, or guaranteed the payment of, the amount that should become due to plaintiff by reason of sales of fruit to Herbert during the season of 1896. Hpon…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fullam v. AdamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864
- Ellison v. Jackson Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Malone v. Crescent City Mill & Transportation Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- Harris v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Clay v. WaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Steward v. SirrineArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- Montgomery v. DornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Avalon Painting Co. v. ALERT LBR. CO., INC.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Wurdeman v. WallerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Johnson v. BentonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.