Legal Opinion

George A. Hunt, Jr., Selective Service No. 9-45-45-1035 v. Local Board No. 197

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 5, 1971No. 18076PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

For different reasons, stated in separate opinions, five judges constituting a majority of the court have concluded that the judgment of the district court dismissing the appellant’s complaint cannot stand. Judges Freedman, Seitz and Adams think that the uncontested facts are such that we should not only reverse the dismissal of the complaint but also order that on remand judgment be entered for the appellant requiring that he be accorded selective service reclassification as III-A. Judges Hastie and Gibbons think that we should do no more than require that the district…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

4Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. Allen Dinardo StephensCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  2. United States v. Neal Thomas NeamandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  3. Russell M. Morgan v. Bert MelcharCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. John L. Naskiewicz, Jr. v. Howard Lawver, Chairman, and Selective Service Local Board No. 61, Cayuga County, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API