Legal Opinion
Goller v. Stubenhaus
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Action to restrain the defendants from interfering with the rights and the property of the plaintiff’s association.
1Opinion of the CourtGtegebich, J.
The action is to enjoin and restrain the defendants from interfering with the rights and property of the First Heustadter Congregation Sick and Benevolent Association in any manner whatsoever; from using the name and seal of the said congregation, and from selling and disposing of or incumbering the property of the same, he it real or personal, and from disturbing the meetings of the congregation, and for such other and further relief in the premises as to the court may seem just and proper. The amended complaint alleges that the First Heustadter Congregation Sick and Benevolent Association…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ostrom v. . GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Rudolph v. Southern Beneficial LeagueNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- J. & A. McKechnie Brewing Co. v. Trustees of the Village of CanandaiguaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
3Cited by5 opinions
- Elevator Operators & Starters' Union v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Application of Credit Info. Corp. of NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- In Re Subpoena Duces Tecum to Testify Before Grand Jury Directed to TRW, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1978
- Hogan v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1945
- In re the Removal of KochAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931