Legal Opinion

Sacco v. Department of Public Works

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 7, 1967PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpiegel, J.

The plaintiffs, all residents of the town of Arlington, seek by this bill in equity to enjoin the Department of Public Works (department) from conducting “any filling operations in Spy Pond” and for a determination that such operations are unlawful. The case was heard in the Superior Court on a statement of agreed facts. The trial judge made findings, rulings and order for decree. A final decree was entered dismissing the bill. From this decree the plaintiffs appealed.

“Spy Pond is a ‘great pond’ within the meaning of G. L. c. 91, § 35, 2 ***and G. L. c. 131, § 1, 3 ... is owned by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Higginson v. Treasurer & School House CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Gould v. Greylock Reservation CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  3. Old Colony Railroad v. Framingham Water Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Appleton v. Massachusetts Parking AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  5. City of Boston v. Inhabitants of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Opinions of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Kootenai Environmental Alliance, Inc. v. Panhandle Yacht Club, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Robbins v. Department of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  4. Newburyport Redevelopment Authority v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  5. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API