Ronald Lee v. Mercury Insurance Company of Georgia
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDillard, Chief Judge
The majority's Herculean effort to manufacture ambiguity out of otherwise unexceptionable and plain policy language is perfectly understandable. Lee is a sympathetic party. He stepped up to help a dear friend during a difficult time, and for that, we commend him. But the policy says what it says, and no act of kindness can change that. Nevertheless, the majority has chosen to disregard the plain meaning of the policy and well-settled precedent in order to achieve a result to its liking-accomplishing this extraordinary feat with only a semicolon and an unsubstantiated and irrelevant deposition…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Lessee of Ewing v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- Boardman Petroleum, Inc. v. Federated Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- McCann v. Glynn Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- York Insurance v. Williams Seafood of Albany, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- American Strategic Insurance v. HelmCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.