Legal Opinion

Wheeling Clinic v. Van Pelt

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1994No. 22309PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McHUGH, Justice:

This is an appeal from the final judgment of the Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia, which upheld the validity of a covenant not to compete contained in a partnership agreement but which held that the liquidated damages provision contained in that same agreement was unenforceable to the extent of fifty percent of the agreed damages. The partnership, the Wheeling Clinic (hereinafter “the Clinic”), appeals the circuit court’s decision insofar as it determined that the liquidated damages provision was a penalty clause and thus, unenforceable as to one hundred percent of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Painter v. PeavyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Mandolidis v. Elkins Industries, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Raymundo v. Hammond Clinic Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Wassenaar v. PanosWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Geisinger Clinic v. Di CuccioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Guiliano v. Cleo, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Weaver v. RitchieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Kelly v. MarxMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  4. Huntington Eye Associates, Inc. v. LocascioWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Gordonsville Energy, L.P. v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Richmond County Circuit Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API