Legal Opinion
Vardon v. Federal Reserve System
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 31, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2011-1565Published
1Opinion of the Court
/:lL~O UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT AUG3t CI.rIc, u 2011 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COurts fo~Sih District & 8 e District 0 ankruptcy f COlumbia JAMES M. VARDON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. L1 ) THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and pro se complaint. Plaintiff alleges that the Federal Reserve Bank's purported policies of maximum employment, stable prices and moderate long-term interest rates have failed, and have resulted in financial losses to plaintiff. See…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Navegar, Incorporated and Penn Arms, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Hollander v. McCainDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2008
- Beckman v. BattinDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1995