Legal Opinion

State v. Rider

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 22, 1996No. 24368PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, Justice:

Appellant was convicted of stalking under S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-1070 (Supp. 1994). While this appeal was pending, § 16-3-1070 was expressly repealed without a saving clause and a new stalking statute was enacted redefining this crime. See 1995 S.C. Act No. 94. A conviction must be vacated if the penal statute the defendant is charged with violating is repealed without a saving clause while the case is pending on appeal. State v. Spencer, 177 S.C. 346, 357-58, 181 S.E. 217 (1935).1 Accordingly, appellant’s conviction is

Vacated.

Finney, C.J., and Toal, Waller, and Burnett, JJ.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. VarnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Plantation Shutter Co., Inc. v. EzellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  3. State v. CharronCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  4. Ray Bell Construction Co. v. School DistrictCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API