Vereline v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
Defendant moved for summary judgment in its favor on the ground that the doctrine of laches bars plaintiff’s claim challenging her separation from the United States Air Force on October 18,1968, and plaintiff has opposed. After oral argument the parties submitted supplemental memoranda addressing the novel question of whether a plaintiff can be charged with inexcusable delay when her cause of action is based on a constitutional right which did not obtain judicial recognition until many years after her cause of action accrued upon her separation in 1968.
FACTS
Under the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brundage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Cook v. ArentzenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- Deering v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Norman A. Foster and Charles T. Heimerdinger v. United States, Ronald R. Olson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Park v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986