Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Gansley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1916No. Docket No. 107Published

Exceptions before sentence from Ingham; Collingwood, J. Jacob Gansley was convicted of violating the corrupt practices act.

1DissentBrooke, J.

In approaching the discussion in this case, my Brother Stone treats the statute as remedial in character, whereas it is in fact highly penal. Section 18 of the act provides that upon conviction for a violation of any of its provisions the person so convicted may be punished by a fine of not more than $1,000, or by imprisonment for not more than two years, either or both, at the discretion of the court. We have held in a great number of - cases that penal statutes must be strictly construed; in other words, that the liberty or property of the citizen shall not be taken from him, except for the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. GadwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. People v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Robinson v. HarmonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Crosby v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Deloria v. AtkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API