Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Harmon

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1908No. Docket No. 12PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Berrien; Coolidge, J. Debt by John Robinson against Judson Harmon, receiver of the Pere Marquette Railroad Company, for the amount of a penalty provided by section 6335, 3 Comp. Laws. A judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

This case involves the same transactions and the construction of the same statute as in the preceding case. The decision in that case (ante, 366 [117 N. W. 661]), is controlling in this upon all the questions therein passed upon. The cases were heard and submitted together, and are designated in the records as the “Overcharge Case” and the “Penalty Case.” Our disposition of the Overcharge Case leaves but one question , to be considered in this, the Penalty Case.

Section 6335, 3 Comp. Laws, provides that every such railroad corporation shall, on the due payment of freight legally authorized,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Central Trust Co. v. Wabash, St. L. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1886
  3. Robinson v. HarmonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Western Michigan University Board of Control v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Albuquerque Hilton Inn v. HaleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Robinson v. RobinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Tew v. Hillsdale Tool & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. People v. JacksonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API