Legal Opinion

Thomas Branch & Co. v. Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 17, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChichester, J.

This case is the sequel to the case of Branch & Co. v. Riverside and Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc., reported in 139, Va. at page 291, 123 S. E. 542. The early history of the ease is fully set out in the opinion as reported in that ease and it will not be repeated in detail here.

Thomas Branch & Company will hereafter be referred to as Branch & Company, and the Riverside and Dan River Cotton Mills will be referred to as the mills.

Branch & Company were, prior to January 1, 1920, and are now the owners, so'far as the books of the mills show, of 671 shares of its preferred stock.

On July 28, 1920,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Friederichsen v. RenardSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. United States Telegraph Co. v. GildersleveCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
  3. Steinman v. Clinchfield Coal Corp.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1917
  4. New River Mineral Co. v. PainterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
  5. Rowe v. RandIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Colvin v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928
  2. Jones v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
  3. Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Thomas Branch & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  4. Sharrow v. LePageNorfolk County Circuit Court · 1989
  5. United States v. Boat Harbor Marine Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API