Virginia Department of Corrections v. Clark
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.
The dispositive question in this habeas corpus appeal is whether trial counsel’s representation of James T. Clark, Jr., during the penalty phase of his capital murder trial, constituted ineffective assistance of counsel.
I
On August 29, 1978, a jury convicted Clark of capital murder for willful, deliberate, and premeditated killing for hire, Code § 18.2-31(b). Following a separate penalty proceeding, pursuant to Code § 19.2-264, the jury determined that Clark’s conduct in committing the offense was “outrageously or wantonly vile, horrible or inhuman in that it involved depravity of mind or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr., (Decoster Iii)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. BassCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
- Williams v. Warden of Mecklenburg Correctional CenterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
- Executive Car & Truck Leasing v. DeSerioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Curo v. BeckerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
- Murray v. GriffithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.