Legal Opinion

Murray v. Griffith

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 17, 1992No. Record 911255PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Compton

The sole issue in this habeas corpus appeal is whether the trial court erred in ruling that an accused was denied effective assistance of counsel.

In 1989, appellee Charles Richard Griffith was convicted in the court below in a bench trial of robbery and malicious wounding, and sentenced to 17 years’ imprisonment. In 1990, after withdrawing an appeal of the convictions, the prisoner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus naming appellant, Edward W. Murray, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, as the respondent. In this collateral attack on the convictions, the convict asserted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Stokes v. Warden, Powhatan Correctional CenterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  3. Virginia Department of Corrections v. ClarkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Williams v. Warden of Mecklenburg Correctional CenterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
  2. Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. Hedrick v. Warden of Sussex I State PrisonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  4. Moore v. HinkleSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  5. Curo v. BeckerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API